Bio-pics are usually terrible, insomuch as historical accuracy often quashes thematic development, resulting in a flat, disengaging exercise in technical acuity and aesthetic minutia. But in revisiting the monochromatic biopic about former world middleweight boxing champion Jake LaMotta after sifting through Scorsese's hit-and-miss resume, there's a resurgence in understanding just how it is that this film developed its prestige. ![]() It's like the water cooler white noise of the cineaste world, falling into background commonality without undue extrapolation, understood without added dissection. ![]() There isn't a great deal left to say about Raging Bull or Martin Scorsese's fascination with violence and the sociological factors that purport its simultaneous legitimacy and illegality, given the cultural ubiquity of the title and the man himself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |